MySpace Buys iLike in Effort to Best Rivals

August 22nd, 2009

MySpace is acquiring online music service iLike, as the social-networking site faces a drop-off in visitors and tries to remake itself as a destination for music, videos, games and other entertainment content.

Terms of the deal weren’t disclosed, but a person familiar with the situation said it’s valued at nearly $20 million.

ILike, started by tech industry veterans and brothers Ali and Hadi Partovi, lets users on social-networking sites share music. It was created in 2006 to retool GarageBand.com, which had sought to create an independent music community for recording artists to promote themselves.

Can Yahoo’s Carol Bartz Outsmart Microsoft And Google?

August 22nd, 2009
USA online advertising revenues for top four portals

USA online advertising revenues for top four portals

Bartz is betting Yahoo can bring up display revenues and make money leveraging Microsoft’s search engine. Right now that’s more plan than reality.

The day before surgery to replace her left knee, Yahoo Chief Carol A. Bartz animatedly described the procedure. “They cut just above here,” she said, miming the moves of the scalpel, saw and drill. “Then, they just glue it back on.” Everything went well–Bartz stayed awake for it–and now, nearly a month post-op, she compares the feel of her knees. The swollen one with the nasty scar is measurably warmer, she notes, fascinated by the process of deep cuts and recovery. It’s just days after a different surgical procedure–the amputation of Yahoo’s search business, in exchange for a ten-year revenue-sharing deal with Microsoft. This one hasn’t gone as smoothly. Accusing her of selling the future of the company for a mess of pottage, Silicon Valley and Wall Street erupted in a rage, beating down the stock 15% to settle into a trough of $14.50 or so. This on the heels of a spurned $47 billion acquisition offer last year from Steve Ballmer, who now walked away with an agreement worth perhaps one-tenth as much to Yahoo, seemed to scorch whatever goodwill Bartz had built up during her seven-month tenure.

Bartz is angry and unapologetic. “People were hoping to make quick bucks,” she says with contempt, brandishing charts that appear to show how much her deal can earn over the long term. “I’m betting the economy will come back. I know it will. I’m betting online ads will get bigger market share. I’m betting Microsoft will be maniacal about search, and we’ll get a big share of that. I’m betting on getting my margins up. For the background to all of it, I’m betting on getting the audience for Yahoo up.”

That combative optimism is pure Bartz, and it has generally served her well throughout careers at 3M, Sun Microsystems and especially at Autodesk, where she turned a small, one-trick tech outfit into a design-software powerhouse. Yahoo poses formidable and enduring challenges. To convince investors that she hasn’t sold off the best of the $7.2 billion (sales) company, Bartz will have to show rapid improvements to the top and bottom lines. The company’s core asset, Bartz insists, is not search (even though keyword ads represented better than a third of the $65 billion in worldwide Internet advertising last year) but in Yahoo’s ability to reach 500 million-plus people in 30 countries, putting ads in front of them all. That, she says, is the proper focus. Satisfy users and their wallets will follow.

Bartz, 60, took Yahoo out of what will be a very expensive arms race for the Web crawling and query analysis that is 80% to 90% of the cost of search. (A day after the deal Ballmer vowed to spend $1.2 billion or more on search technology next year.) Yahoo kept one valuable aspect of it: the display of the answers. Yahoo engineers are working on a search results page that, instead of today’s almost undifferentiated menu of links, creates an engaging page of informational choices about the search results. The effect is less like a Google page–or one from Microsoft’s Bing–and more like a newspaper with real-time information.

Look up a hotel in Athens, Greece and an overview page will deliver a picture of it, a locator map, ratings of the service, attractions nearby and a list of what’s new in town. There are tabs to other reviews, images and discussions about the hotel. Search for a bank and you get its Web site, the latest company news, including stock price, and a list of nearby branches. Soon to appear after Microsoft takes over search, these pages can accommodate Yahoo display ads along with the sponsored links that are Google’s mainstay.

The new look of search is a year or more off, though, and Bartz needs to get the ad dollars faster than that. Postdeal, Yahoo still keeps sales relationships with the world’s biggest advertisers and control of blended search-and-display ad deals. The idea is to get more search revenue, of course, and to encourage more users to stay longer inside a more valuable service. Yahoo Mail has 98 million users in the U.S. alone, almost three times as much as Microsoft’s Windows Live e-mail and four times as much as Gmail from Google. Yahoo News claims six times as many readers as the four highest-circulation dailies combined. Three million photos a day go onto its Flickr photo service. Two hundred and sixty million ads a month are submitted to Yahoo, and 20 million are manually reviewed for content. Six million are rejected for inappropriate content. Bartz wants to get ad numbers up and kill more of what she calls the tasteless “tits and teeth” ads that drive away viewers.

“If I can get the half a billion viewers to 600 or 700 million by making Yahoo Social better, cricket coverage in India better, a better home page, the advertisers will come to us,” she says. “The job is to increase circulation, make Yahoo the center of people’s online lives.” Raising traffic 20% or more, Yahoo’s deal with Microsoft could yield more revenue than Yahoo now pulls in on search, while cutting costs.

Ignored in all the shouting over the search deal is Yahoo’s revamped home page, where banner ads go up for $1 million a day. The new version lets users customize Yahoo with access to competitors like Facebook, the Wall Street Journal online and Gmail. Those sites pop over the home page, along with a tailored ad; sweep the mouse over your Forbes.com page and maybe a bank ad pops up. If you like cooking site Epicurious.com, you might get a pitch from Target, with revenue going to Yahoo, not the content creator.

Coming next will be more personalized choices and tailored advertisements than anywhere else on the Web. Search Yahoo for information on a Toyota Prius, then head over to Yahoo Sports and you’ll see a Prius ad. A brand campaign planned for the fall aims to build audience in areas like Internet video and Web access on mobile devices, as well as traditional Yahoo sites. Every user’s every move within the Yahoo kingdom will eventually be monitored from new data centers in cities like Lockport, N.Y. and La Vista, Nebr. Like Amazon and Netflix, Yahoo will suggest things to read, watch and share with friends, and try to proposition the user with ads likely to spark the greatest chance of engagement.

In one experiment, Yahoo tested the behavior of 1.5 million registered users who also shopped in department stores. By controlling the display and frequency of ads, it learned it could lift in-store, not just online, purchases by as much as 90% with some customers, particularly those over 40.

Geographically targeted ads sent by e-mail, Yahoo found, have response rates five to ten times as high as generic ads. Its deal to sell advertising alongside a consortium of 800-plus U.S. newspapers gives Yahoo a sales force that can target businesses by zip code; along with a separate agreement to use AT&T’s Yellow Pages sales group, this is another 13,000 salespeople. Plans for new sites like high school sports (game schedules, player profiles, even college recruitment news) provide more content for ads.

Ad production software will eventually cut the steps necessary to design and release display advertising, so that the entire process takes a day, not weeks. Yahoo says such efficiencies could drive out of business many of the 400 or so small advertising networks, paid small amounts by advertisers for sales leads generated when users take an action, like visiting an advertiser’s site, buying something, signing up for a newsletter or turning over their e-mail address. That would leave Yahoo to compete head-on with bigger rivals like a reconstituted AOL and Google (via DoubleClick), which are looking at better ad-buying automation, too.

Bartz is spoiling for the contest. “Ah, Schmidt,” she says dismissively, referring to Eric Schmidt, the Google boss alongside whom she worked for nine years at Sun Microsystems. “He really does believe the world is all formulas; we think it’s a little more complex than that.” Not satisfied, she adds, “I am much more of an operations person than he is.”

Blunter, too. Her first meeting with Yahoo’s board began with a technical question about company business. “No f—— way I can answer that,” she said, according to Chairman Roy Bostock. “I just got here.”

At age 8 Bartz lost her mother and, after her father was unable to care for her and her brother, moved to her grandmother’s farm near Alma, Wis. She recalls screaming after finding a snake in the rafters. “My grandmother grabbed the snake, tossed it on the ground and cut off its head with a shovel,” Bartz recalls. “Then she said to me and my brother, ‘You didn’t need me to do that,’ and walked off.” Grandma’s performance review stuck. Bartz was a cheerleader and homecoming queen in high school; she also worked in hairnets for food service and fishnets as a cocktail waitress through college. Graduating from the University of Wisconsin at Madison with an honors degree in computer science, Bartz worked in sales at 3M and Digital Equipment Corp., before following a friend to Sun Microsystems in 1983.

At Sun she was tough but won respect in a particularly hard-charging Valley company by, among other things, insisting that people listen to their customers. “She is one of the few people I have worked for who has no problem telling you that you’re full of shit–and afterward, you don’t mind,” says William Coleman, who joined Sun in 1985 and later founded the software company BEA Systems with two other executives who worked for Bartz.

Focusing on the customer, even at the expense of engineering genius, is another Bartz hallmark. “She is good at figuring out what people will buy, why they buy it and what you can do to make them pay more,” says Carl Bass, who has known Bartz since soon after her 1992 arrival as chief executive at Autodesk, which makes software for computer-aided design and manufacturing.

Her first day there Bartz fired the head of sales. Two days later she was diagnosed with breast cancer and went in shortly after for surgery. She worked from her hospital bed, cutting a six-week recovery to four weeks, a decision she now calls wrong. While easing out managers who didn’t go along with her way of doing things, she set up frequent lunches to hear feedback and complaints.

She also redefined Autodesk’s visualization software to include manufacturing, civil engineering, media and architecture. New products kicked up revenue. But a big push into 3-D software took three very uneven years. Bartz fired Bass twice and rehired him twice, finally naming him to succeed her when she stepped down in 2006. By then Autodesk revenue had climbed to $1.5 billion, from $300 million; its share price had jumped tenfold.

A rock from her days at Autodesk, engraved with the word “Believe,” is now by her corner window at her third-floor office in Yahoo’s Sunnyvale, Calif. headquarters. (It has 5,000 employees in the Bay Area and 13,000 elsewhere.) The rock has sat there since January, when she replaced cofounder Jerry Yang, whom Bartz met while serving on the board of Cisco Systems. (She initially dodged Yang’s proposals; Chairman Bostock says he sold her hard on the job until she concluded, “This is something I can do.”) Yahoo was disorganized and demoralized in the wake of the rejected takeover offer by Microsoft at $31 a share. Yang, doing a second tour of duty as chief after years of failed leadership from the likes of Timothy Koogle and Terry Semel, was being squeezed by dissident shareholder Carl Icahn to find a replacement.

Besides the rock, Bartz brought a passion for discipline and analysis to her office. In her first two months she held tête-à-têtes with executives and engineers, trying to make a single company out of many fiefdoms. Yahoo has perhaps a million computers, connected by fiber-optic cable working at 115 gigabits per second in data centers around the world. It blocks tens of billions of attempted spams every day. It has engineers, designers, ad sellers and editors in 20 countries and content in 30 languages.

There have been some simplifications. Bartz is shrinking Yahoo’s 11 different enterprise resource software programs down to 2 or 3. There is now but one design component needed to summon the home page, instead of 33. Bartz hopes to reduce from 400 to one the number of codes used companywide (local engineers will be allowed to tinker on the margin to suit their markets).

“The idea is that we’re all in this together–ads, content, technology,” says Hilary Schneider, head of North American sales and one of a new Bartz-culled triumvirate, along with Aristotle (Ari) Balogh, chief technical officer, and Elisa Steele, chief marketing officer. Every big product change requires input from all groups. “The way Carol has built this, we can’t succeed individually,” says Steel, before Schneider cuts in, saying, “Production, engineering and business development have to happen together.” Adds Balogh, “There were silos before; now there is a ‘Ready, fire, fire, fire’ approach.”

Bartz’s job approximates that of trying to change a couple of tires on a car going 75mph. She’s got to get the remake of Yahoo right and in a hurry. Her early corporate cleaning bought her some sympathy and, perhaps, a quarter or two of hassle-free work. That has been clipped by the Microsoft deal, and no one knows how far the patience of prickly board member Carl Icahn, who holds 5.4% of the company, can be stretched. “Icahn is just another shareholder,” says Bartz with typical insouciance. “What’s he going to do, fire me?”

Searching for a Win
Bartz is betting Yahoo can bring up display revenues and make money leveraging Microsoft’s search engine. Right now that’s more plan than reality.

Microsoft’s Bing wins share from Google, Yahoo

August 22nd, 2009

SEATTLE (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp’s Bing search engine continued to make small gains on rivals Google Inc and Yahoo Inc in the U.S. Internet search market in July, according to the latest data from research firm ComScore.

Microsoft, which launched Bing in early June, racked up 8.9 percent of U.S. Internet searches in July, up 0.5 percentage points from June.

Google, the leader in the market, and Yahoo, the distant No. 2, both lost 0.3 percentage points of market share in July, to 64.7 percent and 19.3 percent, respectively.

Late last month Microsoft and Yahoo finally signed an agreement to cooperate on Internet search advertising, with Bing powering searches on both companies’ sites and Yahoo handling the ad sales.

The deal has yet to be approved by regulators and likely won’t take full effect in the market until early 2012.

Digital Marketing Strategy

June 30th, 2009

Online is just one more marketing & sales channel and should sit under the broader organisational level sales & marketing strategy. Digital marketing does however bring with it some novel tools & extra levers with rapidly evolving ideas about how to best deploy them. Here are a few considerations around the formation of your online marketing strategy:

Segment, Sub-segment & Sub-sub-segment

Segmentation is the key to successful digital marketing. Applying old school mass marketing methodologies will achieve the same old school mixed & fuzzy results.

Install Analytics

Measuring the quantity, quality and source of website traffic is now an essential marketing practice.

Harmonize your Online and Offline Marketing Collateral

Websites should compliment an organization’s off-line marketing collateral. Branding and market positioning should appear consistent across all touch-points.

Website Improvement for Search Engines (SEO)

A website must be picked up by the search engines for the most important keywords around the various market segments which it’s targeting.

Website Improvement for Human Visitors

A website should appear fresh, up-to date, clean and organized. It should load quickly. It should be easy to navigate to anywhere in the site from anywhere in the site. It should positioned as a value driven work horse (not a sugar eating show pony).

Develop skills In-house

Outsource the more complicated aspects of digital marketing to the professionals, but bring the essential skills in-house. Control your own website content, make adjustments to your own online campaign settings, interpret and act upon your own website analytics.

Calculate Your Return on Investment (ROI)

Track and measure everything. Assign all actionable outcomes - not just sales - an internal financial value. By tracing outcomes directly to their campaign sources it’s a simple process to calculate the ROI for each campaign dollar spent.

Think Global

Break away from the idea that marketing gets more expensive the wider the geographic net is cast. Digital Marketing is about whom you’re marketing to, not where you’re marketing into. Physical distance from any point is a meaningless concept in a digital marketplace.

Google’s Anti-Malvertising.com Fights Off Bad Ads

June 19th, 2009

The site was created because Google has a significant interest in making sure that ad blocking doesn’t become a standard security practice.

Google (NSDQ: GOOG) on Thursday quietly launched a new search site called Anti-Malvertising.com to help its ad network partners identify potential providers of malicious advertisements. The Web site establishes a new home for a previously created custom search engine focused on malware, a home furnished with educational resources.

“Malvertising,” a combination of the terms “malware” and “advertising,” describes online ads that are viral in the wrong way: They attempt to infect the viewer’s computer. “Badvertising” is a variant term.

“Some cybercriminals attempt to use advertising to distribute malware,” the site explains. “Possible vectors of attack include malicious code hidden within an ad creative (such as a swf file), embedded on a Web page, or within software downloads.”

The site was created by Google’s Anti-Malvertising Team to mitigate the impact of bad ads on Google properties and on the Web sites operated by partners. The reason is simple: Google has a significant interest in making sure that ad blocking doesn’t become a standard security practice.

“It certainly seems that awareness of the industry-wide issue of malvertising is on the rise,” said Eric Davis, a member of Google Anti-Malvertising team, in an e-mail. “This site fits into our broader goal to help and encourage all members of the online advertising ecosystem to take an active role in malvertising prevention. It’s one part of Google’s commitment to educating our customers, improving the industry as a whole, and making the Internet a safer place for everyone.”

In early 2008, Niels Provos, a security engineer at Google, said in a blog post that about 2% of malicious Web sites were distributing malware through advertising, based on an analysis of about 2,000 known advertising networks. In 2007, the Q1 2007 Web Trends Security Report published by Finjan said that about 80% of malicious code online at the time came from online ads.

In February of this year, eWeek.com inadvertently displayed a fake Lacoste shirt ad that directed visitors to a site hosting malware. And there have been several similar incidents this year at high-profile sites like MLB.com and FoxNews.com.

The Google custom search engine on Anti-Malvertising.com is designed to provide publishers with background information about advertisers. Fed an advertiser’s name, company name, or ad URL, it returns information that may be useful in assessing whether the advertiser is trustworthy.

Anti-Malvertising.com also includes educational resources for those trying to defend against cyberthreats.

U.S. Ad Spending Fell 14% in First Quarter

June 11th, 2009

U.S. ad spending on media such as TV, print and online display ads fell 14% to $30.18 billion in the first quarter from a year earlier, according to TNS Media Intelligence, despite guardedly optimistic talk in recent weeks about a bottoming out in the market.

The numbers, which exclude categories such as online-search ads and in-store ads, suggest that the ad downturn is far more pronounced than many expected. “We are now in the record books with the worst quarter in a decade,” said Jon Swallen, TNS’s senior vice president of research.

TNS, an ad-tracking firm owned by WPP PLC, said a recovery in the media business may take time. “So far it looks like second-quarter spending is starting pretty much the same way the first quarter ended. There are hopeful signs of general economic indicators bottoming out, but the advertising sector still appears to be lagging behind,” Mr. Swallen said.

The Internet was the only medium to see growth. Online display advertising, which includes banners, was up 8.2%, TNS said. Other researchers have signaled that digital advertising has been less insulated from the recession. Last week, PricewaterhouseCoopers said U.S. online-ad spending fell 5% in the first quarter to $5.5 billion.

Top ad executives are expressing little hope that the second quarter will bring relief. On Tuesday, Maurice Levy, chief executive of Paris-based Publicis Groupe, said “the second quarter will be the toughest quarter, with an improvement coming in the second half of the year.”

WPP Chief Executive Martin Sorrell said last week that the ad market worsened in April.

Still, some media executives, including CBS’s Leslie Moonves, have recently said that sentiment among advertisers is improving.

TNS said the ad market was hampered by double-digit pullbacks in spending by big industries like autos and financial services.

Ad spending in the automotive category slid 28%, with local car-dealer ad spending taking the biggest hit, falling almost 50%. Spending by financial services companies fell 18%.

[adspend]

Source: WallStreetJournal

Case Study: Girding for a Leaner P&G

June 11th, 2009

An expected change in top management at Procter & Gamble could further an already troubling trend for Madison Avenue: a winnowing of the number of advertising firms used by big ad spenders.

Ad executives greeted with some trepidation the news that P&G was poised to appoint a new chief executive. On Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported that P&G’s board was expected to approve a plan to replace longtime CEO A.G. Lafley with Robert McDonald, currently its chief operating officer. Mr. Lafley would remain chairman.

[procter and gamble and advertising]

The change is expected to be announced Wednesday morning, according to a person familiar with the matter.

In ad circles, Mr. McDonald is regarded as a no-nonsense executive who, along with P&G’s global marketing chief Marc Pritchard, has been streamlining the way the company works with advertising and marketing companies.

That effort could cut a number of ad agencies and marketing firms out of the spoils, according to ad executives close to the company. P&G, the world’s biggest advertiser, spends about $8.7 billion annually on promotions ranging from TV ads to in-store marketing programs for products like Tide laundry detergent and Pampers diapers.

“They are pushing to get more service for less money,” says one ad executive familiar with the company.

A P&G spokeswoman declined to comment.

Madison Avenue is undergoing a broad contraction sparked by the economic crisis and tumult in the auto industry. General Motors, which until last year was the second-largest ad spender in the U.S., behind P&G, has already slashed the fees it pays to its ad firms and — ad executives familiar with the company say — will likely cut down on the number of ad firms it employs.

Mr. McDonald’s expected appointment raises questions about how P&G’s massive advertising budget might be affected. The consumer-products company slashed its U.S. ad spending on conventional media, including TV and print, and Web display ads by 6% last year to $3.2 billion, according to WPP’s TNS Media Intelligence.

P&G has been moving more of its ad dollars to digital media, and has been pressuring media companies for price breaks. Ad executives familiar with P&G suggest that both patterns will continue under the new regime.

[procter and gamble ads]

With Mr. McDonald, people will see “much leaner and more efficient ways to build a brand than P&G has in the past,” says an ad executive familiar with the matter.

P&G now works with thousands of ad and marketing firms around the globe. Mr. McDonald probably will seek to cut down on the number of firms it uses, according to people familiar with the matter. One executive suggests that smaller firms are likely to be more vulnerable as P&G seeks to further consolidate its ad business in an effort to save money.

P&G recently said it was continuing with a new approach to marketing in which it pulls together a team of experts culled from different ad and marketing companies to work on a given brand under one leader. It’s a process, dubbed internally “the brand franchise leadership model,” that P&G began slowly adopting in 2007.

P&G, like many marketers, has become frustrated with the lack of collaboration between its ad and marketing-services firms. Marketing services include in-store marketing and direct mail, among other functions.

The new approach is intended to eliminate turf wars. The company is hoping to foster collaboration among the people who create ads for TV and print and the other experts who do things such as research consumer behavior and design Web promotions.

“We are establishing a brand-agency-leader design that will simplify our business, lower our costs and improve capability by eliminating thousands of individual contracts and generating much more holistic advertising and marketing,” Mr. Lafley said last month at an investor conference in New York.

One executive close to P&G suggests that the company may ultimately try to reduce the number of ad-holding companies it deals with to two. It currently uses Paris-based Publicis Groupe, Dublin-based WPP Group and New York-based Omnicom Group.

Over the past few years, under Mr. Lafley and Jim Stengel, P&G’s former global marketing czar, the company expanded the number of firms it employed as it sought to bring more creativity to its marketing. For example, it added Wieden + Kennedy, the Portland Ore. firm known for its Nike campaigns, to its roster of ad shops in 2006.

Mobile Web Access, Apps on the Rise, per eMarketer

June 11th, 2009

Applications of every sort have become ubiquitous in the mobile space.

On the heels of Apple’s success with the App Store, unveiled in July 2008, other device manufacturers and operating system providers, including BlackBerry and the Android platform championed by Google, opened their own virtual storefronts. Still others are readying for launch later this year, all hoping to take a bite out of Apple.

eMarketer projects that mobile Internet access, through either traditional browsers or installed applications, will see significant gains over the next five years, reaching 134.3 million mobile Internet users in 2013.

For many marketers, mobile applications constitute an increasingly necessary avenue for reaching and engaging with their customers, whether by building a proprietary application or sponsoring a third-party effort.

In both cases, the essential challenge remains: to understand consumer behavior and craft experiences that resonate with a target audience and integrate with other channels.

Source: AdWeek

Revenue at Craigslist Is Said to Top $100 Million

June 11th, 2009

As the newspaper industry and its classified advertising business wither, one company appears to be doing extraordinarily well: Craigslist.

The Internet classified ads company, which promotes its “relatively noncommercial nature” and “service mission” on its site, is projected to bring in more than $100 million in revenue this year, according to a new study from Classified Intelligence Report, a publication of AIM Group, a media and Web consultant firm in Orlando, Fla.

That is a 23 percent jump over the revenue the firm estimated for 2008 and a huge increase since 2004, when the site was projected to bring in just $9 million. “This is a down-market for just about everyone else but Craigslist,” said Jim Townsend, editorial director of AIM Group. The firm counted the number of paid ads on the site for a month and extrapolated an annual figure. It said its projections were conservative.

By contrast, classified advertising in newspapers in the United States declined by 29 percent last year, its worst drop in history, according to the Newspaper Association of America.

Craigslist, based in San Francisco, would not comment on the study. “We are a privately held company and never comment on guesses of our revenue. Nor have we ever commented on any number bandied around in the past,” said Susan MacTavish Best, a Craigslist spokeswoman.

The firm did not project profits, but Craigslist keeps its expenses low. It has just 30 employees.

Craigslist allows people and companies to post free classified online ads in 570 cities around the world. But in 18 major American cities, the company charges recruiters $25 (or in San Francisco, $75) to place a help-wanted ad. In New York, it charges real estate brokers $10 to post individual listings for apartments and houses.

Craigslist also charges for ads in its erotic services category, which the company renamed “adult services” and pledged to begin monitoring after it was pressured by state attorneys general who said the category had become a marketplace for prostitution. Craigslist said it had donated money made from that category to charity.

AIM Group projected that more than 80 percent of Craigslist revenue came from recruitment ads, with most of the remainder coming from housing ads in New York. Its most lucrative markets were New York City, on track to generate $17.7 million in 2009, and San Francisco, with $14.4 million, AIM Group said.

Mr. Townsend said the numbers belied the claims of Craig Newmark, Craigslist’s founder, and Jim Buckmaster, its chief executive, that the company was not profit-minded.

About 24 percent of Craigslist is owned by eBay. The two companies sued each other last year over corporate governance issues. The dispute is coming to trial later this month.

Source: NewYorkTimes

Microsoft Experimenting With Bing Ad Placement, Formats

June 11th, 2009

bing

Learning algorithms in Microsoft’s new search engine Bing aim to retrain consumers to think of paid search and display ads as another topic category that helps them find answers to questions. But as consumers warm up to Bing, the technology built into the site may take a bit longer to influence performance.

Similar to a fledgling attempting to fly, Bing has a lot of machine learning to do. It will take time for the engine to learn when — or not — to serve up ads. Algorithms and machine understanding of human behavior drive the site.

Making ads more relevant took a front seat in the development of Bing, according to Microsoft. Although it appears that ad and marketing agencies knew this all along, some felt that paid search ads — which return alongside queries — were missing from results. They wondered whether Microsoft had decided to slowly phase in PPC advertising. Others thought a glitch in the engine stopped Bing from serving up paid links.

Brian Boland, director of adCenter product management for the Microsoft Advertising group, says the Redmond, Wash. company embarked on two projects during the past year to improve the relevancy of paid search ads. “Think of where and when the ads show up as another set of very valuable results to the searcher,” he says.

Timing is everything. Recent research conducted by Microsoft reveals that consumers expect to see paid search ads. If nothing shows up, the results are not as accurate or relevant. So Microsoft built in a range of technologies to improve ad rankings. Algorithms teach the engine about the person conducting the searches. Signals tell the engine whether to serve up an ad.

Boland believes that agency executives are testing Bing by searching on topics, yet they click on nothing. From that behavior, the learning algorithm begins to think the person searching doesn’t like ads, so it stops serving up ads. He says the method increases click-through rates when ads are shown.

A searcher reveals her thought process through the search tabs in the left column. It should give advertisers insight into the types of keywords to buy.

Bing’s performance has begun to improve Microsoft’s position in search. During the first week of Bing’s public launch, analysis from comScore reveals a substantial uptick. U.S. search on Microsoft sites rose to 15.5% between June 2 and 6, up from 13.8% between May 26 and 30 — an indication that the search engine is reaching more people than before. Microsoft’s share of search result pages in the U.S., a proxy for overall searches, increased from 9.1% to 11.1% during the same time.

Still, agencies may have to learn new ways to present vertical categories to clients, Boland says. As for display ads, Microsoft has asked agency executives to start dreaming up new ways to present advertising. The company will not limit ads to a certain format. In fact, during the next few months, it will begin to experiment. “Display ads are not out of the question, especially in entertainment for new movies,” Boland says.