Archive for the ‘Internet Researches & Reports’ Category

Can Yahoo’s Carol Bartz Outsmart Microsoft And Google?

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009
USA online advertising revenues for top four portals

USA online advertising revenues for top four portals

Bartz is betting Yahoo can bring up display revenues and make money leveraging Microsoft’s search engine. Right now that’s more plan than reality.

The day before surgery to replace her left knee, Yahoo Chief Carol A. Bartz animatedly described the procedure. “They cut just above here,” she said, miming the moves of the scalpel, saw and drill. “Then, they just glue it back on.” Everything went well–Bartz stayed awake for it–and now, nearly a month post-op, she compares the feel of her knees. The swollen one with the nasty scar is measurably warmer, she notes, fascinated by the process of deep cuts and recovery. It’s just days after a different surgical procedure–the amputation of Yahoo’s search business, in exchange for a ten-year revenue-sharing deal with Microsoft. This one hasn’t gone as smoothly. Accusing her of selling the future of the company for a mess of pottage, Silicon Valley and Wall Street erupted in a rage, beating down the stock 15% to settle into a trough of $14.50 or so. This on the heels of a spurned $47 billion acquisition offer last year from Steve Ballmer, who now walked away with an agreement worth perhaps one-tenth as much to Yahoo, seemed to scorch whatever goodwill Bartz had built up during her seven-month tenure.

Bartz is angry and unapologetic. “People were hoping to make quick bucks,” she says with contempt, brandishing charts that appear to show how much her deal can earn over the long term. “I’m betting the economy will come back. I know it will. I’m betting online ads will get bigger market share. I’m betting Microsoft will be maniacal about search, and we’ll get a big share of that. I’m betting on getting my margins up. For the background to all of it, I’m betting on getting the audience for Yahoo up.”

That combative optimism is pure Bartz, and it has generally served her well throughout careers at 3M, Sun Microsystems and especially at Autodesk, where she turned a small, one-trick tech outfit into a design-software powerhouse. Yahoo poses formidable and enduring challenges. To convince investors that she hasn’t sold off the best of the $7.2 billion (sales) company, Bartz will have to show rapid improvements to the top and bottom lines. The company’s core asset, Bartz insists, is not search (even though keyword ads represented better than a third of the $65 billion in worldwide Internet advertising last year) but in Yahoo’s ability to reach 500 million-plus people in 30 countries, putting ads in front of them all. That, she says, is the proper focus. Satisfy users and their wallets will follow.

Bartz, 60, took Yahoo out of what will be a very expensive arms race for the Web crawling and query analysis that is 80% to 90% of the cost of search. (A day after the deal Ballmer vowed to spend $1.2 billion or more on search technology next year.) Yahoo kept one valuable aspect of it: the display of the answers. Yahoo engineers are working on a search results page that, instead of today’s almost undifferentiated menu of links, creates an engaging page of informational choices about the search results. The effect is less like a Google page–or one from Microsoft’s Bing–and more like a newspaper with real-time information.

Look up a hotel in Athens, Greece and an overview page will deliver a picture of it, a locator map, ratings of the service, attractions nearby and a list of what’s new in town. There are tabs to other reviews, images and discussions about the hotel. Search for a bank and you get its Web site, the latest company news, including stock price, and a list of nearby branches. Soon to appear after Microsoft takes over search, these pages can accommodate Yahoo display ads along with the sponsored links that are Google’s mainstay.

The new look of search is a year or more off, though, and Bartz needs to get the ad dollars faster than that. Postdeal, Yahoo still keeps sales relationships with the world’s biggest advertisers and control of blended search-and-display ad deals. The idea is to get more search revenue, of course, and to encourage more users to stay longer inside a more valuable service. Yahoo Mail has 98 million users in the U.S. alone, almost three times as much as Microsoft’s Windows Live e-mail and four times as much as Gmail from Google. Yahoo News claims six times as many readers as the four highest-circulation dailies combined. Three million photos a day go onto its Flickr photo service. Two hundred and sixty million ads a month are submitted to Yahoo, and 20 million are manually reviewed for content. Six million are rejected for inappropriate content. Bartz wants to get ad numbers up and kill more of what she calls the tasteless “tits and teeth” ads that drive away viewers.

“If I can get the half a billion viewers to 600 or 700 million by making Yahoo Social better, cricket coverage in India better, a better home page, the advertisers will come to us,” she says. “The job is to increase circulation, make Yahoo the center of people’s online lives.” Raising traffic 20% or more, Yahoo’s deal with Microsoft could yield more revenue than Yahoo now pulls in on search, while cutting costs.

Ignored in all the shouting over the search deal is Yahoo’s revamped home page, where banner ads go up for $1 million a day. The new version lets users customize Yahoo with access to competitors like Facebook, the Wall Street Journal online and Gmail. Those sites pop over the home page, along with a tailored ad; sweep the mouse over your Forbes.com page and maybe a bank ad pops up. If you like cooking site Epicurious.com, you might get a pitch from Target, with revenue going to Yahoo, not the content creator.

Coming next will be more personalized choices and tailored advertisements than anywhere else on the Web. Search Yahoo for information on a Toyota Prius, then head over to Yahoo Sports and you’ll see a Prius ad. A brand campaign planned for the fall aims to build audience in areas like Internet video and Web access on mobile devices, as well as traditional Yahoo sites. Every user’s every move within the Yahoo kingdom will eventually be monitored from new data centers in cities like Lockport, N.Y. and La Vista, Nebr. Like Amazon and Netflix, Yahoo will suggest things to read, watch and share with friends, and try to proposition the user with ads likely to spark the greatest chance of engagement.

In one experiment, Yahoo tested the behavior of 1.5 million registered users who also shopped in department stores. By controlling the display and frequency of ads, it learned it could lift in-store, not just online, purchases by as much as 90% with some customers, particularly those over 40.

Geographically targeted ads sent by e-mail, Yahoo found, have response rates five to ten times as high as generic ads. Its deal to sell advertising alongside a consortium of 800-plus U.S. newspapers gives Yahoo a sales force that can target businesses by zip code; along with a separate agreement to use AT&T’s Yellow Pages sales group, this is another 13,000 salespeople. Plans for new sites like high school sports (game schedules, player profiles, even college recruitment news) provide more content for ads.

Ad production software will eventually cut the steps necessary to design and release display advertising, so that the entire process takes a day, not weeks. Yahoo says such efficiencies could drive out of business many of the 400 or so small advertising networks, paid small amounts by advertisers for sales leads generated when users take an action, like visiting an advertiser’s site, buying something, signing up for a newsletter or turning over their e-mail address. That would leave Yahoo to compete head-on with bigger rivals like a reconstituted AOL and Google (via DoubleClick), which are looking at better ad-buying automation, too.

Bartz is spoiling for the contest. “Ah, Schmidt,” she says dismissively, referring to Eric Schmidt, the Google boss alongside whom she worked for nine years at Sun Microsystems. “He really does believe the world is all formulas; we think it’s a little more complex than that.” Not satisfied, she adds, “I am much more of an operations person than he is.”

Blunter, too. Her first meeting with Yahoo’s board began with a technical question about company business. “No f—— way I can answer that,” she said, according to Chairman Roy Bostock. “I just got here.”

At age 8 Bartz lost her mother and, after her father was unable to care for her and her brother, moved to her grandmother’s farm near Alma, Wis. She recalls screaming after finding a snake in the rafters. “My grandmother grabbed the snake, tossed it on the ground and cut off its head with a shovel,” Bartz recalls. “Then she said to me and my brother, ‘You didn’t need me to do that,’ and walked off.” Grandma’s performance review stuck. Bartz was a cheerleader and homecoming queen in high school; she also worked in hairnets for food service and fishnets as a cocktail waitress through college. Graduating from the University of Wisconsin at Madison with an honors degree in computer science, Bartz worked in sales at 3M and Digital Equipment Corp., before following a friend to Sun Microsystems in 1983.

At Sun she was tough but won respect in a particularly hard-charging Valley company by, among other things, insisting that people listen to their customers. “She is one of the few people I have worked for who has no problem telling you that you’re full of shit–and afterward, you don’t mind,” says William Coleman, who joined Sun in 1985 and later founded the software company BEA Systems with two other executives who worked for Bartz.

Focusing on the customer, even at the expense of engineering genius, is another Bartz hallmark. “She is good at figuring out what people will buy, why they buy it and what you can do to make them pay more,” says Carl Bass, who has known Bartz since soon after her 1992 arrival as chief executive at Autodesk, which makes software for computer-aided design and manufacturing.

Her first day there Bartz fired the head of sales. Two days later she was diagnosed with breast cancer and went in shortly after for surgery. She worked from her hospital bed, cutting a six-week recovery to four weeks, a decision she now calls wrong. While easing out managers who didn’t go along with her way of doing things, she set up frequent lunches to hear feedback and complaints.

She also redefined Autodesk’s visualization software to include manufacturing, civil engineering, media and architecture. New products kicked up revenue. But a big push into 3-D software took three very uneven years. Bartz fired Bass twice and rehired him twice, finally naming him to succeed her when she stepped down in 2006. By then Autodesk revenue had climbed to $1.5 billion, from $300 million; its share price had jumped tenfold.

A rock from her days at Autodesk, engraved with the word “Believe,” is now by her corner window at her third-floor office in Yahoo’s Sunnyvale, Calif. headquarters. (It has 5,000 employees in the Bay Area and 13,000 elsewhere.) The rock has sat there since January, when she replaced cofounder Jerry Yang, whom Bartz met while serving on the board of Cisco Systems. (She initially dodged Yang’s proposals; Chairman Bostock says he sold her hard on the job until she concluded, “This is something I can do.”) Yahoo was disorganized and demoralized in the wake of the rejected takeover offer by Microsoft at $31 a share. Yang, doing a second tour of duty as chief after years of failed leadership from the likes of Timothy Koogle and Terry Semel, was being squeezed by dissident shareholder Carl Icahn to find a replacement.

Besides the rock, Bartz brought a passion for discipline and analysis to her office. In her first two months she held tête-à-têtes with executives and engineers, trying to make a single company out of many fiefdoms. Yahoo has perhaps a million computers, connected by fiber-optic cable working at 115 gigabits per second in data centers around the world. It blocks tens of billions of attempted spams every day. It has engineers, designers, ad sellers and editors in 20 countries and content in 30 languages.

There have been some simplifications. Bartz is shrinking Yahoo’s 11 different enterprise resource software programs down to 2 or 3. There is now but one design component needed to summon the home page, instead of 33. Bartz hopes to reduce from 400 to one the number of codes used companywide (local engineers will be allowed to tinker on the margin to suit their markets).

“The idea is that we’re all in this together–ads, content, technology,” says Hilary Schneider, head of North American sales and one of a new Bartz-culled triumvirate, along with Aristotle (Ari) Balogh, chief technical officer, and Elisa Steele, chief marketing officer. Every big product change requires input from all groups. “The way Carol has built this, we can’t succeed individually,” says Steel, before Schneider cuts in, saying, “Production, engineering and business development have to happen together.” Adds Balogh, “There were silos before; now there is a ‘Ready, fire, fire, fire’ approach.”

Bartz’s job approximates that of trying to change a couple of tires on a car going 75mph. She’s got to get the remake of Yahoo right and in a hurry. Her early corporate cleaning bought her some sympathy and, perhaps, a quarter or two of hassle-free work. That has been clipped by the Microsoft deal, and no one knows how far the patience of prickly board member Carl Icahn, who holds 5.4% of the company, can be stretched. “Icahn is just another shareholder,” says Bartz with typical insouciance. “What’s he going to do, fire me?”

Searching for a Win
Bartz is betting Yahoo can bring up display revenues and make money leveraging Microsoft’s search engine. Right now that’s more plan than reality.

Microsoft’s Bing wins share from Google, Yahoo

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009

SEATTLE (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp’s Bing search engine continued to make small gains on rivals Google Inc and Yahoo Inc in the U.S. Internet search market in July, according to the latest data from research firm ComScore.

Microsoft, which launched Bing in early June, racked up 8.9 percent of U.S. Internet searches in July, up 0.5 percentage points from June.

Google, the leader in the market, and Yahoo, the distant No. 2, both lost 0.3 percentage points of market share in July, to 64.7 percent and 19.3 percent, respectively.

Late last month Microsoft and Yahoo finally signed an agreement to cooperate on Internet search advertising, with Bing powering searches on both companies’ sites and Yahoo handling the ad sales.

The deal has yet to be approved by regulators and likely won’t take full effect in the market until early 2012.

U.S. Ad Spending Fell 14% in First Quarter

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

U.S. ad spending on media such as TV, print and online display ads fell 14% to $30.18 billion in the first quarter from a year earlier, according to TNS Media Intelligence, despite guardedly optimistic talk in recent weeks about a bottoming out in the market.

The numbers, which exclude categories such as online-search ads and in-store ads, suggest that the ad downturn is far more pronounced than many expected. “We are now in the record books with the worst quarter in a decade,” said Jon Swallen, TNS’s senior vice president of research.

TNS, an ad-tracking firm owned by WPP PLC, said a recovery in the media business may take time. “So far it looks like second-quarter spending is starting pretty much the same way the first quarter ended. There are hopeful signs of general economic indicators bottoming out, but the advertising sector still appears to be lagging behind,” Mr. Swallen said.

The Internet was the only medium to see growth. Online display advertising, which includes banners, was up 8.2%, TNS said. Other researchers have signaled that digital advertising has been less insulated from the recession. Last week, PricewaterhouseCoopers said U.S. online-ad spending fell 5% in the first quarter to $5.5 billion.

Top ad executives are expressing little hope that the second quarter will bring relief. On Tuesday, Maurice Levy, chief executive of Paris-based Publicis Groupe, said “the second quarter will be the toughest quarter, with an improvement coming in the second half of the year.”

WPP Chief Executive Martin Sorrell said last week that the ad market worsened in April.

Still, some media executives, including CBS’s Leslie Moonves, have recently said that sentiment among advertisers is improving.

TNS said the ad market was hampered by double-digit pullbacks in spending by big industries like autos and financial services.

Ad spending in the automotive category slid 28%, with local car-dealer ad spending taking the biggest hit, falling almost 50%. Spending by financial services companies fell 18%.

[adspend]

Source: WallStreetJournal

Case Study: Girding for a Leaner P&G

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

An expected change in top management at Procter & Gamble could further an already troubling trend for Madison Avenue: a winnowing of the number of advertising firms used by big ad spenders.

Ad executives greeted with some trepidation the news that P&G was poised to appoint a new chief executive. On Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported that P&G’s board was expected to approve a plan to replace longtime CEO A.G. Lafley with Robert McDonald, currently its chief operating officer. Mr. Lafley would remain chairman.

[procter and gamble and advertising]

The change is expected to be announced Wednesday morning, according to a person familiar with the matter.

In ad circles, Mr. McDonald is regarded as a no-nonsense executive who, along with P&G’s global marketing chief Marc Pritchard, has been streamlining the way the company works with advertising and marketing companies.

That effort could cut a number of ad agencies and marketing firms out of the spoils, according to ad executives close to the company. P&G, the world’s biggest advertiser, spends about $8.7 billion annually on promotions ranging from TV ads to in-store marketing programs for products like Tide laundry detergent and Pampers diapers.

“They are pushing to get more service for less money,” says one ad executive familiar with the company.

A P&G spokeswoman declined to comment.

Madison Avenue is undergoing a broad contraction sparked by the economic crisis and tumult in the auto industry. General Motors, which until last year was the second-largest ad spender in the U.S., behind P&G, has already slashed the fees it pays to its ad firms and — ad executives familiar with the company say — will likely cut down on the number of ad firms it employs.

Mr. McDonald’s expected appointment raises questions about how P&G’s massive advertising budget might be affected. The consumer-products company slashed its U.S. ad spending on conventional media, including TV and print, and Web display ads by 6% last year to $3.2 billion, according to WPP’s TNS Media Intelligence.

P&G has been moving more of its ad dollars to digital media, and has been pressuring media companies for price breaks. Ad executives familiar with P&G suggest that both patterns will continue under the new regime.

[procter and gamble ads]

With Mr. McDonald, people will see “much leaner and more efficient ways to build a brand than P&G has in the past,” says an ad executive familiar with the matter.

P&G now works with thousands of ad and marketing firms around the globe. Mr. McDonald probably will seek to cut down on the number of firms it uses, according to people familiar with the matter. One executive suggests that smaller firms are likely to be more vulnerable as P&G seeks to further consolidate its ad business in an effort to save money.

P&G recently said it was continuing with a new approach to marketing in which it pulls together a team of experts culled from different ad and marketing companies to work on a given brand under one leader. It’s a process, dubbed internally “the brand franchise leadership model,” that P&G began slowly adopting in 2007.

P&G, like many marketers, has become frustrated with the lack of collaboration between its ad and marketing-services firms. Marketing services include in-store marketing and direct mail, among other functions.

The new approach is intended to eliminate turf wars. The company is hoping to foster collaboration among the people who create ads for TV and print and the other experts who do things such as research consumer behavior and design Web promotions.

“We are establishing a brand-agency-leader design that will simplify our business, lower our costs and improve capability by eliminating thousands of individual contracts and generating much more holistic advertising and marketing,” Mr. Lafley said last month at an investor conference in New York.

One executive close to P&G suggests that the company may ultimately try to reduce the number of ad-holding companies it deals with to two. It currently uses Paris-based Publicis Groupe, Dublin-based WPP Group and New York-based Omnicom Group.

Over the past few years, under Mr. Lafley and Jim Stengel, P&G’s former global marketing czar, the company expanded the number of firms it employed as it sought to bring more creativity to its marketing. For example, it added Wieden + Kennedy, the Portland Ore. firm known for its Nike campaigns, to its roster of ad shops in 2006.

Study: Local Search Firms Need Biz Model

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

While the business of search advertising is booming, a recent report questions whether its popularity is based more on “potential” than “payoff.”

According to a new report from Borrell Associates, client churn rates for companies selling search is close to 60 percent, with most of the attrition by the third or fourth month. As many as 80 percent of clients may be gone in 12 months. Some companies lose as much as 90 percent of their clients.

The Borrell report commissioned by Clickable and released Monday (June 8) outlines ways companies can capitalize on an ad segment that didn’t exist nine years ago but today represents 4 percent of all advertising expenditures.

“The quick emergency of the multibillion-dollar paid-search industry has spawned unrealistic expectations among local businesses eager to turn the Web into a cash register and a cottage industry of companies eager to bolster that dream,” the Borrell report said. “SEM [search engine marketing] has no doubt been oversold and mismanaged by resellers, leaving many local businesses disillusioned with a product that holds so much promise.”

For businesses that can offer a scalable platform to advertisers, the potential is considerable, especially in local advertising. Local search is projected to grow 29.5 percent over the next five years, from $4.1 billion last year to $5.3 billion in 2013.

In contrast, small and medium sized businesses are forecast to decrease ad spending on yellow pages, newspapers, radio and direct mail by 19 percent, representing average annual decline of $3.4 billion. While spending on paid search by local advertisers is forecast to rise 39 percent, representing average annual increased of $242 million. Other interactive media affiliated with local search, such as video and email, are forecast to increase at triple-digit rates by 2013, adding $1.1 billion per year to interactive media spending.

To harness the numbers and control churn, companies offering SEM services will need to develop better business models. “It has yet to scale,” the Borrell report said. “What the industry desperately needs are analytical tools that advertisers can use to assess and recalibrate how they spend their dollars.”

Source: MediaWeek

Who’s Watching Your Online Reputation?

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

Business reputations often take years to develop, but can be undone with a single Tweet. Solution providers should engage with the same social media as their customers to both promote and defend their reputation.

There has been a lot of discussion about how businesses and individuals need to participate in social networks to get their messages out, but there is little discussion related to managing online reputation.

Vehicles such as Angies List, Facebook and YouTube are prime locations for your customers to share their positive or negative experiences related to your company. There are also thousands of blogs that are sharing information with customers every day on what they liked or disliked about their experiences with businesses.

If you are still not convinced that your online presence is important consider that women are nearly twice as likely to use blogs than social networking sites as a source of information (64 percent), advice and recommendations (43 percent) and opinion-sharing (55 percent), according to a recent 2009 Women and Social Media study.

From somScore, the data figures for video views from November 2008 finds more and more people are watching videos—about 146 million or 77 percent of the U.S. Internet audience. This is up over one-third year over year.

Your customers are online and not just looking at your Web site and Facebook page for information about your company. What took you years to develop in local reputation can be brought down in a day with negative commentary. Therefore, it pays to protect your brand where ever consumers are offered a degree of interaction.

It’s important that either you have an employee who conducts comprehensive online reputation management to ensure that your brand attributes are protected across all social channels. Another option is to hire an outside company to regularly monitor for negative commentary and, if any is found, combat it by researching the situation, discerning if any action is required, and then engage the problem.

A good response will provide facts and ask for corrections if required. This is where your company blog or those of your employees and customers can be invaluable. Opening the conversation to as many sides as possible and broadening the discussion.

Some key areas to consider when dealing with your online reputation management:

Do not get defensive: Even if your customer is not correct in what they wrote, you cannot criticize them. You need to reach out, listen, try to understand their perspective and then work to resolve their concerns. How you handle a situation is often more important that the actions that caused or resolved the situation. In the social networking world, style counts.

The best defense is a well executed offense: You do not wait for a virus to attack your network, so why would you wait for negative postings to protect your online reputation? Begin with your customer service. It is always easier to work with a happy customer than it is to negate and unhappy one. Proactive postings on a regular basis through blogs, Twitter, and other social mediums can go a long way. Don’t forget to share good news as it happens as well. When appropriate a shared press release between you and a customer goes a long way to bolstering your reputation in the marketplace.

Hire an objective source: It is hard to be objective when it comes to your own brand and reputation. Just as it is difficult to evaluate your own work, it is challenging at best to understand outside perceptions of your business. Many outside companies assist with keeping your business top of mind with existing and potential customers.

You do not need to invest millions, or even thousands of dollars in your online reputation management, but you do need to pay attention to what is being said about your business. An investment of just a few thousand dollars can go a long way to building and protecting your brand and business.

Source: ChannelInsider

When Will Marketers Boost Spending?

Friday, May 29th, 2009

ANA survey says most firms will rev up activities 3-6 months before recession ends

Will ad agencies need to wait until the recession has certifiably ended before they see a rebound in their clients’ spending? A survey released today by the Association of National Advertisers gives a glimmer of hope that marketers’ expenditures will turn upward sooner than that.

In online polling last month among members of the ANA’s Brand Marketer Leadership Community panel, 68 percent of respondents said they plan boost their media budgets as the economy recovers; 41 percent said they’ll increase their spending on social networking/word of mouth. As for the timing, 73 percent said “they would ideally implement these increased marketing activities three to six months before the recession ends, and an additional 16 percent as soon as it ends.”

A renewed focus on long-term brand-building will represent a shift from what many marketers have been doing as the recession deepened. The ANA’s report of the findings says two-thirds of marketers “have shifted their emphasis to more short-term strategies in the last six months.” Such a shift is reflected in the answers respondents gave when asked to cite the areas in which they’ve cut back. Fifty-six percent said they’ve cut media budgets, and 41 percent said the same about sponsorship/events activities. The activity most likely to have been increased amid the recession: “pricing deals,” cited by 47 percent of respondents.

For all the flux in marketers’ use of media, TV remained atop the standings when respondents were asked to say which media are effective for building brand equity. Sixty-four percent cited TV. Though down from 80 percent in a similar February 2007 poll, that still put TV ahead of online (61 percent) and “guerrilla/word of mouth/buzz marketing” (57 percent). Lagging farther behind were magazines (51 percent, down from 67 percent in 2007), radio (30 percent, down from 36 percent), outdoor (26 percent, down from 35 percent) and newspapers (19 percent, down from 36 percent). Social media garnered the most mentions as “the media channel that marketers would like to use but have not yet been able to implement.”

Elsewhere in the survey (conducted in conjunction with marketing-services firm ‘mktg’), respondents were asked about the factors they watch most closely as indicators of “brand health” — i.e., the degree to which brand equity is increasing or declining. “Customer experience/satisfaction” was cited by 48 percent of respondents — up from 37 percent in the 2007 poll. “There is less focus on traditional metrics such as brand image and awareness, which tend to be lagging indicators of brand health,” says the ANA report of the findings.

Source: AdWeek

Study: Mobile Marketing to Grow

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Americans are gradually warming up to the idea of buying things via their mobile phones, particularly young adults and men, found a new study conducted by Harris Interactive for the mobile credit card security firm Billing Revolution.

Harris surveyed 2,029 adults from April 29 to May 1, 1,883 of those surveyed were cell phone owners (93 percent). Close to half (45 percent) said they think that shopping via cell phones is “somewhat safe,” though just over a quarter (26 percent) feel that mobile shopping is completely safe.

Regardless, fewer than half of those surveyed (46 percent) said they would be willing to shop using their cell phones even if safety was not an issue. But attitudes vary based on age and sex, according to Harris. As with many emerging technology-driven habits, younger adults appear more willing to embrace change; 59 percent of the 18-34 crowd feels that mobile shopping is somewhat safe, versus just 34 percent of adults over 55. Also, half of men find the concept of cell phone shopping somewhat safe versus 39 percent of women.

The relative youth, as well as the male-skewing nature of the potential mobile shopping audience seems to influence the sort of purchases respondents indicated they would be willing to make. Harris found that entertainment is likely to emerge as a key mobile commerce category, as willing mobile shoppers said they would be most interested in purchases such as movie tickets, music, mobile video and games.

Officials at Billing Revolution said the survey results indicated that mobile shopping is poised for growth in the near term, as more and more Americans purchase sophisticated smart phones like Apple’s iPhone and spend more time accessing the Internet via these devices. “There’s clearly a large U.S. population of consumers open to the idea of making purchases via their cell phones,” said Andy Kleitsch, CEO Billing Revolution. “With consumers getting more comfortable navigating the Web from mobile phones, mobile commerce is poised for explosive growth, and consumers are very much leading the charge in this direction.”

Source: MediaWeek

Print Advertising Drives Online Leads

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Traditional print media drives online leads, according to data released today from Telmetrics, a Toronto-based company focused on advertising call tracking and measurement solutions.

Telmetrics found that URL visits represented 44% of leads on average, while call traffic generated 56% of leads. Tracking unique URL activity in addition to call measurement demonstrated a 78% increase in overall leads driven by print Yellow Pages.

Specific categories such as Automobile Dealers and Florists demonstrated higher volumes of Web activity. Ads for Automobile Dealers resulted in 184% more clicks than calls, while Florists generated 126% more clicks.

The company measured consumer Web activity generated by more than 1,200 print Yellow Pages ads from November 2008 through April 2009. Each ad included both a unique URL and phone number.

Telmetrics President Bill Dinan was surprised at the results. “We wanted to determine whether the print book was driving online traffic,” he says. “I was a bit of a skeptic at first. I believe traditional behavior would see someone going to search to look for a URL versus going to a traditional offline media property.”

While the first step was to understand how offline ads drive online traffic, the next phase will focus on conversion rates. The study will analyze the number of clicks generated by each participating Web site.

Dinan thought the numbers would have been around 10%, rather than closer to 50%. During the timing evaluated, the ads that used unique URLs — for example, florists2.com — were more often visited than client-specific domains with URL extensions such as publisher.com/ florists.

Telmetrics, founded in 1990, supports customers such as national advertisers, Yellow Pages publishers, agencies and online search companies. It created the URL tracking app, which provides integrated lead reporting, to aid efforts by Yellow Pages publishers in proving the value of the print medium.

Print Yellow Pages publishers across North America commissioned the study. The company can record call and URL activity because each ad includes a unique phone number and URL tracked back to a specific advertisement.

Source: MediaPost

Growing Ad Networks Shaking Up Online Ad Spend

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

More online ad dollars are going to ad networks, and the top dog isn’t Google or Yahoo.

America Online’s Platform-A tops the U.S. rankings for ad networks. That puts Platform-A ahead of Web heavyweight’s Yahoo’s Ad Network in second-place and Google’s Ad Network, in third, according to a comScore report out today. The research firm also said online ad networks posted double-digit growth while grabbing market share from the big sites that sell ad space.

The ranking of the top 25 ad networks based on their reach among U.S. Internet users for April shows AOL/Platform-A reaching 176.5 million Internet users, or 91.5 percent of the total audience, followed by Yahoo Network, with 167.1 million and Google Ad Network with 164.5 million.

Those not familiar with online ad networks, might be surprised to see Internet behemoth Google placing third, but industry watchers say Platform-A has been top dog in the space for some time.

“AOL/Platform-A has had the top spot for a long time. The ad network includes Advertising.com, which has historically had a very wide reach, plus a few other ad networks (Quigo, Tacoda) which give it an even more expansive reach. So in that regard, it’s not particularly surprising since AOL has always had a strong position in the ad network space,” Andrew Lipsman, comScore’s director of industry analysis, InternetNews.com.

Other key findings of the study show that newcomer Fox Audience Network ranked sixth, reaching almost 150 million people, while several ad networks in the top 25 achieved double-digit growth during the past year, led by Turn Inc., up 121 percent, CPX Interactive, up 88 percent, and 24/7 Real Media, growing by 48 percent.

Indeed, the new rankings showing double-digit growth comes at a time when online ad networks are transforming the way online advertising works.

Basically, the ad networks match advertisers with Web publishers, connecting sites that sell ad space with advertisers that want to reach potential customers, often based on shared interests, for instance, sports, outdoor hobbies or travel.

The networks are generally comprised of lots of smaller, lesser-known sites and, as a result, advertisers can reach audiences as big as those at the super-sized Web sites, but at a fraction of the cost. As a result, the ad networks are grabbing more online ad dollars — and according to comScore, growing at a rapid clip.

New ad networks emerging

“Underscoring the growing importance of ad networks to the digital advertising economy, each of the top 25 ad networks has expanded its reach during the past year,” Jack Flanagan, comScore executive vice president, said in a statement. “It almost seems that new ad networks are emerging every day, each aimed at helping advertisers achieve their campaign objectives, whether it’s to deliver reach and frequency or to target a specific audience segment.”

This supports recent research from a Forrester study “Online Advertising Predictions for 2009″ by analyst Emily Riley which said in part:

“Seasoned interactive marketers will turn to ad networks to find bargains. Interactive marketers will look to save money by taking advantage of services provided by ad networks, including creative and analysis, in some cases abandoning their agencies or past content partners in the process. Additionally, online marketers turning away from high prices on branded sites will be looking for value on networks in the form of targeting and bargains on sponsorships.

“What does it mean? Networks that offer free services and technologies or those with brand-focused offerings that cost less than high-end content sites’ offers will do well due to the pressure for better ROI. Brand marketers must be willing to share data with ad networks,” says Riley.

Source: InternetNews