Archive for the ‘Search Engine Advertising’ Category

Digital Marketing Strategy

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

Online is just one more marketing & sales channel and should sit under the broader organisational level sales & marketing strategy. Digital marketing does however bring with it some novel tools & extra levers with rapidly evolving ideas about how to best deploy them. Here are a few considerations around the formation of your online marketing strategy:

Segment, Sub-segment & Sub-sub-segment

Segmentation is the key to successful digital marketing. Applying old school mass marketing methodologies will achieve the same old school mixed & fuzzy results.

Install Analytics

Measuring the quantity, quality and source of website traffic is now an essential marketing practice.

Harmonize your Online and Offline Marketing Collateral

Websites should compliment an organization’s off-line marketing collateral. Branding and market positioning should appear consistent across all touch-points.

Website Improvement for Search Engines (SEO)

A website must be picked up by the search engines for the most important keywords around the various market segments which it’s targeting.

Website Improvement for Human Visitors

A website should appear fresh, up-to date, clean and organized. It should load quickly. It should be easy to navigate to anywhere in the site from anywhere in the site. It should positioned as a value driven work horse (not a sugar eating show pony).

Develop skills In-house

Outsource the more complicated aspects of digital marketing to the professionals, but bring the essential skills in-house. Control your own website content, make adjustments to your own online campaign settings, interpret and act upon your own website analytics.

Calculate Your Return on Investment (ROI)

Track and measure everything. Assign all actionable outcomes - not just sales - an internal financial value. By tracing outcomes directly to their campaign sources it’s a simple process to calculate the ROI for each campaign dollar spent.

Think Global

Break away from the idea that marketing gets more expensive the wider the geographic net is cast. Digital Marketing is about whom you’re marketing to, not where you’re marketing into. Physical distance from any point is a meaningless concept in a digital marketplace.

Google’s Anti-Malvertising.com Fights Off Bad Ads

Friday, June 19th, 2009

The site was created because Google has a significant interest in making sure that ad blocking doesn’t become a standard security practice.

Google (NSDQ: GOOG) on Thursday quietly launched a new search site called Anti-Malvertising.com to help its ad network partners identify potential providers of malicious advertisements. The Web site establishes a new home for a previously created custom search engine focused on malware, a home furnished with educational resources.

“Malvertising,” a combination of the terms “malware” and “advertising,” describes online ads that are viral in the wrong way: They attempt to infect the viewer’s computer. “Badvertising” is a variant term.

“Some cybercriminals attempt to use advertising to distribute malware,” the site explains. “Possible vectors of attack include malicious code hidden within an ad creative (such as a swf file), embedded on a Web page, or within software downloads.”

The site was created by Google’s Anti-Malvertising Team to mitigate the impact of bad ads on Google properties and on the Web sites operated by partners. The reason is simple: Google has a significant interest in making sure that ad blocking doesn’t become a standard security practice.

“It certainly seems that awareness of the industry-wide issue of malvertising is on the rise,” said Eric Davis, a member of Google Anti-Malvertising team, in an e-mail. “This site fits into our broader goal to help and encourage all members of the online advertising ecosystem to take an active role in malvertising prevention. It’s one part of Google’s commitment to educating our customers, improving the industry as a whole, and making the Internet a safer place for everyone.”

In early 2008, Niels Provos, a security engineer at Google, said in a blog post that about 2% of malicious Web sites were distributing malware through advertising, based on an analysis of about 2,000 known advertising networks. In 2007, the Q1 2007 Web Trends Security Report published by Finjan said that about 80% of malicious code online at the time came from online ads.

In February of this year, eWeek.com inadvertently displayed a fake Lacoste shirt ad that directed visitors to a site hosting malware. And there have been several similar incidents this year at high-profile sites like MLB.com and FoxNews.com.

The Google custom search engine on Anti-Malvertising.com is designed to provide publishers with background information about advertisers. Fed an advertiser’s name, company name, or ad URL, it returns information that may be useful in assessing whether the advertiser is trustworthy.

Anti-Malvertising.com also includes educational resources for those trying to defend against cyberthreats.

Study: Local Search Firms Need Biz Model

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

While the business of search advertising is booming, a recent report questions whether its popularity is based more on “potential” than “payoff.”

According to a new report from Borrell Associates, client churn rates for companies selling search is close to 60 percent, with most of the attrition by the third or fourth month. As many as 80 percent of clients may be gone in 12 months. Some companies lose as much as 90 percent of their clients.

The Borrell report commissioned by Clickable and released Monday (June 8) outlines ways companies can capitalize on an ad segment that didn’t exist nine years ago but today represents 4 percent of all advertising expenditures.

“The quick emergency of the multibillion-dollar paid-search industry has spawned unrealistic expectations among local businesses eager to turn the Web into a cash register and a cottage industry of companies eager to bolster that dream,” the Borrell report said. “SEM [search engine marketing] has no doubt been oversold and mismanaged by resellers, leaving many local businesses disillusioned with a product that holds so much promise.”

For businesses that can offer a scalable platform to advertisers, the potential is considerable, especially in local advertising. Local search is projected to grow 29.5 percent over the next five years, from $4.1 billion last year to $5.3 billion in 2013.

In contrast, small and medium sized businesses are forecast to decrease ad spending on yellow pages, newspapers, radio and direct mail by 19 percent, representing average annual decline of $3.4 billion. While spending on paid search by local advertisers is forecast to rise 39 percent, representing average annual increased of $242 million. Other interactive media affiliated with local search, such as video and email, are forecast to increase at triple-digit rates by 2013, adding $1.1 billion per year to interactive media spending.

To harness the numbers and control churn, companies offering SEM services will need to develop better business models. “It has yet to scale,” the Borrell report said. “What the industry desperately needs are analytical tools that advertisers can use to assess and recalibrate how they spend their dollars.”

Source: MediaWeek

Agency Taps YouTube For Corporate Use

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

The majority of ad agency Web sites contain the following components: an “about us” section, executive bios, case studies and a portfolio of work, past and present. And Flash, don’t forget the Flash.

That being said, agencies are searching for a way to tell their story in a non-cookie-cutter format. We’ve seen Modernista direct site visitors to its online properties, like its Facebook profile, Wikipedia page, flickr page and YouTube playlists.

Now, BooneOakley, Charlotte, N.C. has turned its Web site into a series of YouTube videos. Typing BooneOakley.com into a browser now takes you to a YouTube video, deemed the BooneOakley.com home page. The main video tells the story of Billy, a marketing director who meets a tragic demise because he chose a run-of-the-mill agency to create his company’s ad campaign.

The video concludes with snippets of the agency’s print, TV and online work. The main video contains four embedded links that bring visitors to different parts of the agency site, or, in this case, different YouTube videos.

Work by client; work by medium; news, bios, etc. and contact us lay out company information in separate YouTube videos. The agency vision video is a must-watch.

Navigation isn’t what I’d call user-friendly; once you’re finished watching an embedded link, you essentially have to start from the main page, unless what you want to watch can be found on the previous video. Users can click on the previous video link or begin at the home page.

The home page had generated 201,777 views as of this morning, with various sub-videos collecting anywhere from 4,488 views to 30,477. It took the agency two months to build the site.

“We figured the best way to tell our story was to make our Web site one,” said Jim Robbins, copywriter at BooneOakley. “Our original idea was to do so by making our site a single video that could live anywhere on the Web. But soon we realized that YouTube’s embeddable annotations granted us the opportunity to create something much bigger,” continued Robbins.

Expect the site to remain as is for the foreseeable future, with new videos to be added regularly.

According to Robbins, overall site feedback remains positive. “We knew being on YouTube could help us, but we didn’t know just how much Twitter would help. The advertising community was slightly more critical, as we expected. But they also weren’t our target. One major benefit of building a site on YouTube is that it becomes a part of a community, something that is more accessible to the general public,” concluded Robbins.

The Web site even generated a video response,  in BooneOakley format, from Jason Rapport, an unemployed agency creative whose response served as a video resume. Rapport said the video took six hours to create and he was contacted by BooneOakley, but unfortunately, the agency isn’t hiring. Hopefully, someone else is.

Source: MediaPost

Microsoft’s Search for a Name Ends With a Bing

Friday, May 29th, 2009

A year from now, if you hear someone say that — and actually understand what it means — Bill Gates will be a happy billionaire. That is because it will be a sign that Microsoft is finally making progress in its quest to challenge Google in the Internet search business.

Bing, the name Microsoft gave to the new search service it unveiled Thursday, is its answer to Google — a noun that once meant little but has become part of the language as a verb that is a synonym for executing a Web search. After months of, uh, searching, Microsoft settled on Bing to replace the all-too-forgettable Live Search, which itself replaced MSN Search.

Microsoft invested billions of dollars in those services and failed to slow Google’s rise, so a new name certainly can’t hurt. Microsoft’s marketing gurus hope that Bing will evoke neither a type of cherry nor a strip club on “The Sopranos” but rather a sound — the ringing of a bell that signals the “aha” moment when a search leads to an answer.

The name is meant to conjure “the sound of found” as Bing helps people with complex tasks like shopping for a camera, said Yusuf Mehdi, senior vice president of Microsoft’s online audience business group. And if Bing turns into a verb like, say, Xerox, TiVo or, well, Google, that would be nice too. Steven A. Ballmer, Microsoft’s chief executive, said Thursday that he liked Bing’s potential to “verb up.” Plus, he said, “it works globally, and doesn’t have negative, unusual connotations.”

Some branding experts said choosing the name Bing was a good start, but also the easiest part of the challenge facing the company, since most people turn to Google without even thinking about it. Michael Cronan, whose consulting firm helped come up with brands like TiVo and Amazon’s Kindle, said Bing’s sound, brevity and “ing” ending were all positives.

“It has a promise that you are going to find what you are looking for, and that’s great,” Mr. Cronan said. “But its success is entirely wrapped up in the quality of the experience that Microsoft can deliver.”

Peter Sealey, a former chief marketing officer at the Coca-Cola Company, said Microsoft should have picked a name that more directly connotes search. “Bing has no equity; it signals nothing,” Mr. Sealey said. “It is going to be an enormous expense to create an image for this thing called Bing.”

Google’s name is a play on the word googol, which is a 1 followed by 100 zeroes. The company has said the name speaks to its ambitious mission to organize all the world’s information.

Asked about Microsoft’s choice of name at a press conference on Wednesday, Sergey Brin, a Google co-founder, said he did not know enough about the new service to comment on it. Then he deadpanned: “We’ve been pretty happy with the name Google.” Meanwhile, some tech people were already noting that Bing is also an unfortunate acronym: “But It’s Not Google.”

Source: NYTimes

How Facebook Will Upend Advertising

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

The guessing games over Facebook’s worth are back on again. They were reignited by the news on May 26 that Facebook has accepted a $200 million investment that values the company at $10 billion.

Much of the discussion centers on the ability, or lack thereof, of Facebook and other social networks to sell advertising and deliver advertising results. People get on Facebook to socialize, not hunt for products—or so the argument runs.

But that argument misses the point. The question isn’t how advertising will work on Facebook but rather how Facebook and social networks like News Corp.’s (NWS) MySpace are changing advertising. I’m loath to affix the 2.0 moniker to yet another phrase, but if ever an industry needed to be 2.0-ized, it’s advertising.

Almost a century ago, retailer John Wannamaker is reported to have said: “Half of all advertising works, I just don’t know which half.” Today the percentage may be far lower. On the Internet, click-through rates have fallen precipitously as clutter has replaced clarity. These days an ad has performed exceptionally well if at least 1 in 10 people who see it click on it. Much of the time click-through rates that once approached 3% are more like 0.3%.

The Holy Grail of ads: word of mouth
The good news is that we’re on the verge of a major rethinking of advertising’s fundamental premises. One of the biggest challenges facing advertisers is ad credibility. Consumers typically rate advertising as their least credible information channel. However, businesses have continued to invest in advertising because they could compensate for the lack of credibility through broad distribution and high-impact messaging.

Today that trade-off is being turned on its head. Word of mouth—peer opinion—has consistently been rated the most credible source of information. But traditionally there’s been a limit as to how widely you could distribute a friend’s point of view. Readers of a certain age will remember the Fabergé Organics commercial from the 1970s depicting a shampoo user who “told two friends,” who in turn “told two friends, and so on, and so on.” Three decades ago, telling a lot of friends wasn’t nearly as easy as it is now.

Credibility now has a channel for mass distribution. It’s called the Web and it particularly thrives in social networks. Such distribution will have profound implications for how we “advertise.”

Obviously, we can use social networks to reach friends. But social tools woven into various sites can deliver the opinions and reviews of a group—”people like me”—whose views may be just as credible as those of my friends.

Say I’m a chief information officer. I may find the opinions of fellow CIOs I’ve never met every bit as credible as the ones I know—perhaps even more so, in that I’m less willing to denigrate the opinions of people I don’t know. After all, I know the biases and shortcomings of the people in my friendship circle.

Deploying social maps
These tools are showing up in a variety of online destinations. Facebook’s Connect and other similar technologies let people bring their social map with them as they traverse the Internet. Businesses have to be thinking about how they might incorporate the social map into the way they deal with customers and prospects. This is going to be huge—and the opportunities are immediate.

I’m a big fan of Loomia’s SeenThis application. While it was designed for Facebook, I actually “use” it elsewhere. You’re probably familiar with the boxes on such newspapers sites as The Wall Street Journal that show what stories other readers have read. This “most read” designation rarely interests me. However, the Loomia tool gives me an additional box that shows me what stories my Facebook friends and groups have read. Generally I end up clicking through on most or all of those articles. The “recommendation” from my peer group is much more interesting and relevant to me than those of the general WSJ readership or editorial board.

In sum, social networks and related tools are transforming the way companies communicate with consumers and potential consumers in profoundly interesting ways. In this light, questions of Facebook’s valuation are at best mildly amusing to me. If, as I suspect, Facebook is at the vanguard of transforming how companies reach consumers, $10 billion will some day seem laughably small.

Now it’s up to the advertising industry to get its collective head out of the sand and exploit this transformation to its advantage.

Source: BusinessWeek

Yahoo CEO Open to Microsoft Deal

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Yahoo Inc. Chief Executive Carol Bartz said Wednesday she would be open to striking a search deal with Microsoft Corp. if the software giant offered “boatloads of money.”

“If there’s boatloads of money and the right technology involved, we’d do a deal, sure,” Ms. Bartz said at the All Things Digital conference sponsored by The Wall Street Journal. “It’s that simple.”

Ms. Bartz also said Yahoo was interested in acquiring social-networking and video start-ups, noting that video advertising has grown sharply in recent years. She added Yahoo, which has cut thousands of jobs in the past year, doesn’t plan further layoffs.

The future of Yahoo’s search business is a key issue for investors. Ms. Bartz and Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer have talked about forming a partnership on search but the exact nature of any possible deal remains unclear. Mr. Ballmer will speak at the conference on Thursday.

Microsoft was rebuffed when it tried to buy Yahoo last year, but the Redmond, Wash.-based software giant has said it remains open to some sort of deal that could bolster its search capabilities.

Yahoo is the No. 2 U.S. search engine, with 20.4% market share in April, according to market research group comScore. Microsoft continued to lag far behind with about 8% of the market, while rival Google Inc. increased its share by half a percentage point in April to 64.2% of the U.S. market, its highest level ever.

Ms. Bartz faces a number of challenges as she tries to revive Yahoo’s struggling advertising business. Google dominates the search market and is more effective at making money from text ads. Yahoo is also struggling with a dramatic slowdown in display advertising spending, a key market to which Yahoo is more heavily exposed than Google or Microsoft.

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Growing Ad Networks Shaking Up Online Ad Spend

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

More online ad dollars are going to ad networks, and the top dog isn’t Google or Yahoo.

America Online’s Platform-A tops the U.S. rankings for ad networks. That puts Platform-A ahead of Web heavyweight’s Yahoo’s Ad Network in second-place and Google’s Ad Network, in third, according to a comScore report out today. The research firm also said online ad networks posted double-digit growth while grabbing market share from the big sites that sell ad space.

The ranking of the top 25 ad networks based on their reach among U.S. Internet users for April shows AOL/Platform-A reaching 176.5 million Internet users, or 91.5 percent of the total audience, followed by Yahoo Network, with 167.1 million and Google Ad Network with 164.5 million.

Those not familiar with online ad networks, might be surprised to see Internet behemoth Google placing third, but industry watchers say Platform-A has been top dog in the space for some time.

“AOL/Platform-A has had the top spot for a long time. The ad network includes Advertising.com, which has historically had a very wide reach, plus a few other ad networks (Quigo, Tacoda) which give it an even more expansive reach. So in that regard, it’s not particularly surprising since AOL has always had a strong position in the ad network space,” Andrew Lipsman, comScore’s director of industry analysis, InternetNews.com.

Other key findings of the study show that newcomer Fox Audience Network ranked sixth, reaching almost 150 million people, while several ad networks in the top 25 achieved double-digit growth during the past year, led by Turn Inc., up 121 percent, CPX Interactive, up 88 percent, and 24/7 Real Media, growing by 48 percent.

Indeed, the new rankings showing double-digit growth comes at a time when online ad networks are transforming the way online advertising works.

Basically, the ad networks match advertisers with Web publishers, connecting sites that sell ad space with advertisers that want to reach potential customers, often based on shared interests, for instance, sports, outdoor hobbies or travel.

The networks are generally comprised of lots of smaller, lesser-known sites and, as a result, advertisers can reach audiences as big as those at the super-sized Web sites, but at a fraction of the cost. As a result, the ad networks are grabbing more online ad dollars — and according to comScore, growing at a rapid clip.

New ad networks emerging

“Underscoring the growing importance of ad networks to the digital advertising economy, each of the top 25 ad networks has expanded its reach during the past year,” Jack Flanagan, comScore executive vice president, said in a statement. “It almost seems that new ad networks are emerging every day, each aimed at helping advertisers achieve their campaign objectives, whether it’s to deliver reach and frequency or to target a specific audience segment.”

This supports recent research from a Forrester study “Online Advertising Predictions for 2009″ by analyst Emily Riley which said in part:

“Seasoned interactive marketers will turn to ad networks to find bargains. Interactive marketers will look to save money by taking advantage of services provided by ad networks, including creative and analysis, in some cases abandoning their agencies or past content partners in the process. Additionally, online marketers turning away from high prices on branded sites will be looking for value on networks in the form of targeting and bargains on sponsorships.

“What does it mean? Networks that offer free services and technologies or those with brand-focused offerings that cost less than high-end content sites’ offers will do well due to the pressure for better ROI. Brand marketers must be willing to share data with ad networks,” says Riley.

Source: InternetNews