Posts Tagged ‘microsoft’

Microsoft Experimenting With Bing Ad Placement, Formats

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

bing

Learning algorithms in Microsoft’s new search engine Bing aim to retrain consumers to think of paid search and display ads as another topic category that helps them find answers to questions. But as consumers warm up to Bing, the technology built into the site may take a bit longer to influence performance.

Similar to a fledgling attempting to fly, Bing has a lot of machine learning to do. It will take time for the engine to learn when — or not — to serve up ads. Algorithms and machine understanding of human behavior drive the site.

Making ads more relevant took a front seat in the development of Bing, according to Microsoft. Although it appears that ad and marketing agencies knew this all along, some felt that paid search ads — which return alongside queries — were missing from results. They wondered whether Microsoft had decided to slowly phase in PPC advertising. Others thought a glitch in the engine stopped Bing from serving up paid links.

Brian Boland, director of adCenter product management for the Microsoft Advertising group, says the Redmond, Wash. company embarked on two projects during the past year to improve the relevancy of paid search ads. “Think of where and when the ads show up as another set of very valuable results to the searcher,” he says.

Timing is everything. Recent research conducted by Microsoft reveals that consumers expect to see paid search ads. If nothing shows up, the results are not as accurate or relevant. So Microsoft built in a range of technologies to improve ad rankings. Algorithms teach the engine about the person conducting the searches. Signals tell the engine whether to serve up an ad.

Boland believes that agency executives are testing Bing by searching on topics, yet they click on nothing. From that behavior, the learning algorithm begins to think the person searching doesn’t like ads, so it stops serving up ads. He says the method increases click-through rates when ads are shown.

A searcher reveals her thought process through the search tabs in the left column. It should give advertisers insight into the types of keywords to buy.

Bing’s performance has begun to improve Microsoft’s position in search. During the first week of Bing’s public launch, analysis from comScore reveals a substantial uptick. U.S. search on Microsoft sites rose to 15.5% between June 2 and 6, up from 13.8% between May 26 and 30 — an indication that the search engine is reaching more people than before. Microsoft’s share of search result pages in the U.S., a proxy for overall searches, increased from 9.1% to 11.1% during the same time.

Still, agencies may have to learn new ways to present vertical categories to clients, Boland says. As for display ads, Microsoft has asked agency executives to start dreaming up new ways to present advertising. The company will not limit ads to a certain format. In fact, during the next few months, it will begin to experiment. “Display ads are not out of the question, especially in entertainment for new movies,” Boland says.

Microsoft’s Search for a Name Ends With a Bing

Friday, May 29th, 2009

A year from now, if you hear someone say that — and actually understand what it means — Bill Gates will be a happy billionaire. That is because it will be a sign that Microsoft is finally making progress in its quest to challenge Google in the Internet search business.

Bing, the name Microsoft gave to the new search service it unveiled Thursday, is its answer to Google — a noun that once meant little but has become part of the language as a verb that is a synonym for executing a Web search. After months of, uh, searching, Microsoft settled on Bing to replace the all-too-forgettable Live Search, which itself replaced MSN Search.

Microsoft invested billions of dollars in those services and failed to slow Google’s rise, so a new name certainly can’t hurt. Microsoft’s marketing gurus hope that Bing will evoke neither a type of cherry nor a strip club on “The Sopranos” but rather a sound — the ringing of a bell that signals the “aha” moment when a search leads to an answer.

The name is meant to conjure “the sound of found” as Bing helps people with complex tasks like shopping for a camera, said Yusuf Mehdi, senior vice president of Microsoft’s online audience business group. And if Bing turns into a verb like, say, Xerox, TiVo or, well, Google, that would be nice too. Steven A. Ballmer, Microsoft’s chief executive, said Thursday that he liked Bing’s potential to “verb up.” Plus, he said, “it works globally, and doesn’t have negative, unusual connotations.”

Some branding experts said choosing the name Bing was a good start, but also the easiest part of the challenge facing the company, since most people turn to Google without even thinking about it. Michael Cronan, whose consulting firm helped come up with brands like TiVo and Amazon’s Kindle, said Bing’s sound, brevity and “ing” ending were all positives.

“It has a promise that you are going to find what you are looking for, and that’s great,” Mr. Cronan said. “But its success is entirely wrapped up in the quality of the experience that Microsoft can deliver.”

Peter Sealey, a former chief marketing officer at the Coca-Cola Company, said Microsoft should have picked a name that more directly connotes search. “Bing has no equity; it signals nothing,” Mr. Sealey said. “It is going to be an enormous expense to create an image for this thing called Bing.”

Google’s name is a play on the word googol, which is a 1 followed by 100 zeroes. The company has said the name speaks to its ambitious mission to organize all the world’s information.

Asked about Microsoft’s choice of name at a press conference on Wednesday, Sergey Brin, a Google co-founder, said he did not know enough about the new service to comment on it. Then he deadpanned: “We’ve been pretty happy with the name Google.” Meanwhile, some tech people were already noting that Bing is also an unfortunate acronym: “But It’s Not Google.”

Source: NYTimes

Yahoo CEO Open to Microsoft Deal

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Yahoo Inc. Chief Executive Carol Bartz said Wednesday she would be open to striking a search deal with Microsoft Corp. if the software giant offered “boatloads of money.”

“If there’s boatloads of money and the right technology involved, we’d do a deal, sure,” Ms. Bartz said at the All Things Digital conference sponsored by The Wall Street Journal. “It’s that simple.”

Ms. Bartz also said Yahoo was interested in acquiring social-networking and video start-ups, noting that video advertising has grown sharply in recent years. She added Yahoo, which has cut thousands of jobs in the past year, doesn’t plan further layoffs.

The future of Yahoo’s search business is a key issue for investors. Ms. Bartz and Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer have talked about forming a partnership on search but the exact nature of any possible deal remains unclear. Mr. Ballmer will speak at the conference on Thursday.

Microsoft was rebuffed when it tried to buy Yahoo last year, but the Redmond, Wash.-based software giant has said it remains open to some sort of deal that could bolster its search capabilities.

Yahoo is the No. 2 U.S. search engine, with 20.4% market share in April, according to market research group comScore. Microsoft continued to lag far behind with about 8% of the market, while rival Google Inc. increased its share by half a percentage point in April to 64.2% of the U.S. market, its highest level ever.

Ms. Bartz faces a number of challenges as she tries to revive Yahoo’s struggling advertising business. Google dominates the search market and is more effective at making money from text ads. Yahoo is also struggling with a dramatic slowdown in display advertising spending, a key market to which Yahoo is more heavily exposed than Google or Microsoft.

Source: The Wall Street Journal